Your browser does not support the PubReader view.
Go to this page to see a list of supporting browsers.
Korean Society of Dance Science
[ Article ]
Official Journal of the Korean Society of Dance Science - Vol. 36, No. 4, pp.23-37
ISSN: 1229-7836 (Print)
Print publication date 31 Oct 2019
Received 30 Aug 2019 Revised 10 Oct 2019 Accepted 19 Oct 2019
DOI: https://doi.org/10.21539/Ksds.2019.36.4.23

무용전공 대학생의 접근-회피기질, 3×2 성취목표 및 수업참여간의 관계

박기현*
충남대학교
The Relationships between Female University Students’ Approach-Avoidance Temperament, 3×2 Achievement Goals, and Engagement in Dance Classes
Park, Ki-Hyun*
Chungnam National Univ.

Correspondence to: * balletpkh@naver.com

CopyrightⒸ 2019 by the Korean Society of Dance Science

초록

본 연구의 목적은 3×2 성취목표 모델(Elliot, Murayama, & Pekrun, 2011)을 무용수업에 적용시켜 무용전공 여자대학생의 접근-회피기질, 다중 성취목표성향 및 수업참여 간의 구조적 관계를 검증하는데 두었다. 연구대상은 407명의 무용학과 여자대학생이며, 자료는 기술통계, 확인적 요인분석, 상관분석, 그리고 구조방정식모형 분석을 이용하여 처리되었다. 접근-회피기질과 수업참여간의 관계에서 다중 성취목표성향의 매개효과를 검증한 결과는 다음과 같다. 첫째, 무용전공 여자대학생의 접근기질은 과제와 자기 및 타자관련 접근목표를 통해서뿐만 아니라 직접적으로 수업참여에 정적인 영향을 미침으로써 세 가지 접근목표성향이 접근기질과 수업참여간의 관계를 부분 매개의 역할을 수행한다. 둘째, 무용전공 여자대학생의 회피기질은 과제와 자기 및 타자관련 회피목표와 정적으로 관련되어 있으며, 세 회피목표 중에서 자기회피목표는 수업참여에 부정적인 영향을 주지만 과제 및 타자회피목표는 수업참여와 관련이 없다. 이 결과는 무용전공 대학생이 수업시간에 주어진 과제와 자기 자신 그리고 다른 학생들과의 바람직한 비교를 통해 실력을 향상시키려는 목표를 지향하는 것이 중요함을 시사한다.

Abstract

Based on the 3×2 achievement goals model (Elliot, Murayama, & Pekrun, 2011), the main purpose of this study was to test the relationships between female university students’approach-avoidance temperament, multiple achievement goal orientation, and engagement in dance classes. Subjects were 407 female university students majoring in dance. Data were conducted using descriptive statistics, confirmatory factor analysis, and structural equation modeling. The results of the mediation effects of multiple achievement goals in the relationship between approach-avoidance temperament and engagement in dance classes were as follows: First, the approach temperament of female university students majoring in dance positively influenced on engagement in dance classes through task, self, and others approach goals. Second, the avoidance temperament of female university students majoring in dance positively influenced on the avoidance goals of task, self, and others. Female university students’self avoidance goal had a negative impact on engagement in dance classes, but task and others avoidance goals were unrelated to engagement in dance classes. These results indicated that female university students should pursuit achievement goals for their task and self sake and enhancing their skills comparing with others in dance classes.

Keywords:

dance education, achievement motivation, approach-avoidance temperament, 3×2 achievement goals, engagement

키워드:

무용교육, 성취동기, 접근-회피 기질, 3×2 성취목표, 수업참여

References

  • 김경회(2019). 무용수업에서 지각된 동기분위기와 수행만족과의 관계에서 3×2 성취목표와 메타인지전략의 매개효과. 대한무용학회논문집, 77(3), 1-22.
  • 김계수(2011). 구조방정식모형 분석. 서울: 한나래아카데미.
  • 김영숙, 조한익(2014). 성취목표지향성과 자기조절학습의 관계에 관한 메타분석. 교육학연구, 52(3), 147-174.
  • 문호준(2018). 체육학습환경 지각과 참여간의 관계: 다차원적 유능감, 성취목표와 정서의 다중 매개효과. 교원교육, 34(1), 143-163.
  • 박중길, 남진희(2009). 2×2 성취목표 프로파일에 따른 무용 동기분위기 지각과 내적동기 및 수행만족: 군집분석. 한국체육학회지, 48(2), 379-391.
  • 박중길, 문익수(2013). 체육상황에서 3×2 성취목표 모델: 확장적용 및 비교문화적 반복검증. 한국스포츠심리학회지, 24(1), 175-192.
  • 백민경(2011). 무용전공 대학생의 동기분위기 지각과 성취목표성향, 무용열정의 관계. 한국무용연구, 29(2), 165-182. [https://doi.org/10.15726/jkd.2011.29.2.008]
  • 서차영, 장보경(2016). 3×2 무용성취목표 측정도구의 교차타당도 검증. 한국체육학회지, 55(5), 503-516.
  • 송주연(2012). 성취목표와 학업성취의 상관관계에 대한 메타분석. 교육심리연구, 26(1), 225-250.
  • 오유진(2015). 무용전공자의 완벽주의가 인지적 평가, 정서조절 및 무용 지속성에 미치는 영향: 2×2 모형 및 매개효과 검증. 미간행 박사학위논문. 중앙대학교 대학원.
  • 임지형(2013). 무용과 대학생의 성격, 접근-회피동기 및 행동조절 간의 인과적 관계: 3×2 성취목표 관점. 한국체육학회지, 52(6), 409-423.
  • 장보경(2015). 중학생의 접근-회피 기질과 정서 및 체육수업 참여간의 관계. 한국스포츠심리학회지, 26(3), 95-107. [https://doi.org/10.14385/KSSP.26.3.95ISSN1226-685X]
  • 장혜주(2019). 대학 무용수업에서 지각된 동기분위기, 3×2 성취목표 및 정서간의 구조적 관계. 예술교육연구, 17(1), 55-68.
  • Bartels, J. M. (2007). Dispositional positive and negative affect and approach-avoidance achievement motivation. Individual Differences Research, 5(3), 246-259.
  • Bipp, T., Kleingeld, A., & van Dam, K. (2018). Approach and avoidance temperament: An examination of its construct and predictive validity at work. European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 34(3), 196-206. [https://doi.org/10.1027/1015-5759/a000285]
  • Bjϕrnebekk, G., & Diseth, Ǻ. (2010). Approach and avoidance temperaments and achievement goals among children. Personality and Individual Differences, 49, 938-943. [https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2010.07.034]
  • Chen, C., & Zhang, L. (2011). Temperament, personality and achievement goals among Chinese adolescent students. Educational Psychology, 31(3), 339-359. [https://doi.org/10.1080/01443410.2011.559310]
  • Covington, M. V. (2000). Goal theory, motivation, and school achievement: An integrative review. Annual Review of Psychology, 51, 171-200. [https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.51.1.171]
  • Dragan, M., & Dragan, W. (2014). Temperament and anxiety: The mediating role of metacognition. Journal of Psychological Behavioral Assessment, 36, 246-254. [https://doi.org/10.1007/s10862-013-9392-z]
  • Dweck, C., & Leggett, E. (1988). A social–cognitive approach to motivation and personality. Psychology Review, 95, 256–273. [https://doi.org/10.1037//0033-295X.95.2.256]
  • Elliot, A. J., & McGregor, H. A. (2001). A 2×2 achievement goal framework. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 80, 501-519. [https://doi.org/10.1037//0022-3514.80.3.501]
  • Elliot, A. J., & Murayama, K. (2008). On the measurement of achievement goals: Critique, illustration, and application. Journal of Educational Psychology, 100(3), 613–628. [https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.100.3.613]
  • Elliot, A. J., & Thrash, T. M. (2002). Approach-avoidance motivation in personality: Approach and voidance temperaments and goals. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 82(5), 804-818. [https://doi.org/10.1037//0022-3514.82.5.804]
  • Elliot, A. J., Murayama, K., & Pekrun, R. (2011). A 3×2 achievement goal model. Journal of Educational Psychology, 103(3), 632-648. [https://doi.org/10.1037/a0023952]
  • Guan, J., Xiang, P., McBride, R., & Bruene, A. (2006). Achievement goals, social goals, and students' reported persistence and effort in high school physical education. Journal of Teaching in Physical Education, 25(1), 58-74. [https://doi.org/10.1123/jtpe.25.1.58]
  • Johnson, M. L., & Kestler, J. L. (2013). Achievement goals of traditional and nontraditional aged college students: Using the 3 2 achievement goal framework. International Journal of Educational Research, 61, 48-59. [https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijer.2013.03.010]
  • Kaye, M. P., Conroy, D. E., & Fifer, A, M. (2008). Individual differences in incpompetence avoidance. Journal of Sport & Exercise Psychology, 30(1), 110-132. [https://doi.org/10.1123/jsep.30.1.110]
  • Lochbaum, M., Jean-Noel, J., Pinar, C., & Gilson, T. (2017). A meta-analytic review of Elliot’s(1999) Hierarchical model of approach and avoidance motivation in the sport, physical activity, and physical education literature. Journal of Sport and Health Science, 6, 68-80. [https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jshs.2015.07.008]
  • Maehr, M. L., & Meyer, H. A. (1997). Understanding motivation and schooling: Where we’ve been, where we are, and where we need to go. Educational Psychology Review, 9, 371–409.
  • Mascret, N., Cury, F., & Elliot, A. J. (2015). Extending the 3×2 achievement goal model to the sport domain: The 3×2 Achievement Goal Questionnaire for Sport. Psychology of Sport and Exercise, 17, 7-14. [https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psychsport.2014.11.001]
  • McCabe, K. O., Van Yperen, N., Elliot, A. J., & Verbraak, M. (2013). Big five personality profiles of context-specific achievement goals. Journal of Research in Personality, 47(6), 698-707. [https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrp.2013.06.003]
  • Michou, A., Mouratidis, A., Lens, W., & Vansteenkiste, M. (2013). Personal and contextual antecedents of achievement goals: Their direct and indirect relations to students' learning strategies. Learning and Individual Differences, 23, 187-194. [https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2012.09.005]
  • Oertigm D., Schuler, J., Brandstatter, V., & Augustine, A. (2013). The influence of avoidance temperament and avoidance-based achievement goals on flow. Journal of Personality, 82(3), 171-184. [https://doi.org/10.1111/jopy.12043]
  • Olson, K. R. (2005). Engagement and self-control: Superordinate dimension of big five traits. Personality and Individual Differences, 38, 1689-1700. [https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2004.11.003]
  • Palmer, K. K., Chinn, K. M., & Robinson, L. E. (2017). Using achievement goal theory in motor skill instruction: A systematic review. Sports Medicine, 47(12), 2569-2583. [https://doi.org/10.1007/s40279-017-0767-2]
  • Park, G., Dyne, L., & Ilgen, D. (2013). Satisfaction pursuing approach and avoidance goals: Effects of regulatory fit and individual temperaments. Motivation & Emotion, 37(3), 424-432. [https://doi.org/10.1007/s11031-012-9324-3]
  • Park, L. E. (2010). Responses to self-threat: Linking self and relational constructs with approach and avoidance motivation. Social and Personality Psychology, 4(3), 201-221. [https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1751-9004.2009.00247.x]
  • Pekrun, R., Elliot, A. J., & Maier, M. A. (2006). Achievement goals and discrete achievement emotions: A theoretical model and prospective test. Journal of Educational Psychology, 98(3), 583-597. [https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.98.3.583]
  • Rawlings, A. M., Tapola, A., & Niemivirta, M. (2017). Predictive effects of temperament on motivation. International Journal of Educational Psychology, 6(2), 148-182. [https://doi.org/10.17583/ijep.2017.2414]
  • Rothbart, M. K., Ahadi, S. A., & Evans, D. E. (2010). Temperament and personality: Origins and outcomes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 78(1), 122-135. [https://doi.org/10.1037//0022-3514.78.1.122]
  • Rothbart, M. K., Derryberry, D., & Posner, M. I. (1994). A psychological approach to the development of temperament. In J. E. Bates & T. D. Wachs (Eds.), Temperament: individual differences at the interface of biology and behavior (pp. 83-116). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association. [https://doi.org/10.1037/10149-003]
  • Sagayadevan, V., & Jeyaraj, S. (2012). The role of emotional engagement in lecturer-student interaction and the impact on academic outcomes of students achievement and learning. Journal of Scholarship of Teaching and Learning, 12(3), 1-30.
  • Schunk, D. H., Pintrich, P. R., & Meece, J. L. (2008). Motivation in education: Theory, research, and applications (3rd ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson/Merrill Prentice Hall.
  • VanSchyndel, S. K., Eisenberg, N., Valiente, C., & Spinrad, T. L. (2017). Relations from temperamental approach reactivity and effortful control to academic achievement and peer relations in early elementary school. Journal of Research in Personality, 67, 15-26. [https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrp.2015.12.001]
  • Wang, C. K. J., Liu, W. C., Chua, L. L., & Sun, Y. (2017). Psychometric properties of the 3×2 achievement goal questionnaire for sport. International Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology, 15(5), 460-474. [https://doi.org/10.1080/1612197X.2016.1142458]
  • Watson, R. J., & Christensen, J. L. (2017). Big data and student engagement among vulnerable youth: A review. Current Opinion in Behavioral Sciences, 18, 23-27. [https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cobeha.2017.07.004]
  • Wodzinski, A., Jasson, B., & Wadsworth, M. E. (2018). Temperament, coping, and involuntary stress responses in preadolescent children: The moderating role of achievement goal orientation. Anxiety, Stress & Coping, 31(1), 79-92. [https://doi.org/10.1080/10615806.2017.1373325]